Constructed on Hope: Peace, Spirituality, and… Star Wars | Church Life Journal


I spent loads of time as a child imagining myself as a brave Jedi Knight exploring the galaxy, preserving peace, and bringing justice. I might seize the used wrapping paper tubes out of the trash and swing them about like I used to be Obi-Wan Kenobi, the final Jedi standing in opposition to the swarm of B1 Battle Droids descending upon the planet. Cue the music. Cue the lightsaber sounds.

I’m older now—significantly so. However I proceed to marvel what it could be prefer to be a Jedi Knight, armed with nothing greater than a laser sword and a few hokey spiritual powers. However with age has come an unlucky realization, the insistent, uncomfortable but apparent reality embedded within the very cloth of our favourite house opera: the warfare half seems to be assumed and nonnegotiable.

Violence undergirds the whole lot in terms of these star wars. These cardboard tube lightsabers I swung round mimicked weapons that sliced by means of flesh simply as simply because the steel arms of battle droids. These pew-pew sounds of blaster bolts weren’t simply foolish sounding; they blew up buildings and lives. In every of the TIE fighters or X-wings that went spiraling into oblivion, a dwelling being was misplaced. And for each noble Kenobi-esque sacrifice there have been three dozen different life tales snuffed out in some forgotten nook of the galaxy with barely a blink of the attention. This violence, it appears, is central to our shared expertise of a galaxy far, distant.

However does it must be? Is there a 3rd approach? I wrestle now to so simply look previous the informal therapy of warfare and battle when so many communities in our galaxy oh-so-near and oh-so-real reside in fixed concern of bombs falling from the sky. Extra importantly, I wrestle to simply accept that warfare and battle and violence are merely the way in which issues are. Star Wars appears to require them; however can we? Would possibly there be one other approach?

Allow us to see if we will use some insights from that galaxy far, distant to raised perceive the systemic violence embedded inside our personal society—and inside our very selves—that insist upon battle, weapons, and warfare as a vital evil.

“Now not sure that one ever does win a warfare, I’m,” Yoda admits within the sixth season of The Clone Wars. “For in preventing the battles, the bloodshed, already misplaced we’ve.”

Yoda is just not incorrect. By main the warfare efforts, the Jedi have triggered struggling and loss of life, all whereas sustaining the moniker of keepers of the peace. Within the remaining arc of The Clone Wars animated sequence, Rex, the beloved clone captain of the 501st, admits to Ahsoka Tano that he and his fellow clones have fairly combined emotions in regards to the warfare. “Many individuals wished it by no means occurred. However with out it, we clones wouldn’t exist.”

How far more entangled within the methods of violence can one get? One’s very existence is born out of and for violent ends! And but, in Rex’s character, we glimpse the nuanced potential for good tucked inside seemingly infinite evil and struggling. Rex, an excellent man, stands up and steps ahead. He does his obligation to guard the weak and combat for justice. The lives he touches, the guy clones whose hearts he modifies, are simply as actual as his valor, sacrifice, and friendship. However, like all clones, Rex wrestles with whether or not his function goes past violence and battle. Is there—can there be—a spot for him in a galaxy at peace?

Sadly, he by no means will get to seek out out. Order 66 commences as quickly as Rex finishes sharing his reflections on warfare with Ahsoka. And though Ahsoka helps Rex break away from Imperial programming, the rise of the Empire from the ashes of the Republic instantly calls into query the very existence of clones. Rex finds himself preventing a brand new foe.

When you’ve identified nothing however warfare, do you hold preventing despite the fact that the context and the gamers and the declaration of function have modified? That query takes heart stage in The Unhealthy Batch, the animated sequel sequence to The Clone Wars. The clones, created to combat in opposition to the Separatist forces on behalf of the Galactic Republic, discover themselves with new leaders and new enemies—however nonetheless the order to kill.

Do these clones proceed to wage warfare no matter who’s directing the battles? What do their lives even seem like if they aren’t preventing? Are their lives their very own to reside? Or do they without end owe one thing to their warmongering benefactors? And in the event that they select to combat, what then? Do they assist the Republic-turned-Empire, despite the fact that that Empire now stands for what they as soon as fought in opposition to? Or, do they stand in opposition to this new energy, assuming the function of separatists or rebels—the very menace they sought to eradicate mere days and weeks and years earlier?

Good troopers observe orders, we hear repeatedly in The Unhealthy Batch. At first, it’s given as a command. However slowly it turns into a justification. A rationale for avoiding the powerful questions of wars which might be waged without end. Ought to the clones resist Imperial command? Such motion would fly within the face of not solely all they’ve identified, however how they’ve identified the world to work. And so, this twisted mantra seduces good folks into sustaining an unquestioning place on a disconcerting establishment.

Within the third episode of season two of The Unhealthy Batch, a disillusioned Commander Cody asks the Unhealthy Batch-turned-Imperial clone, Crosshair, “Are we making the galaxy higher?” Cody’s subsequent desertion from Imperial command makes clear the reply he has discerned. “We make our personal selections,” Cody insists. “And we’ve to reside with them, too.”

After we are caught up within the machine of warfare, it turns into almost not possible to disentangle ourselves from the established order. And so, if the questions we pose take battle as a given slightly than a chance to probe whether or not loss of life and destruction ought to even be on the desk within the first place, we lure ourselves; we see no different approach.

Can there be a nonviolent path?

“We have been all raised in violence,” writes peace activist John Pricey in his e book The Nonviolent Life. “We’re taught that violence is regular, the way in which of the world, the lifestyle. We now have no inkling that life might be in any other case. It is just pure that we internalize that violence executed to us as youngsters. If we don’t discover and name out that legacy of violence, we are going to proceed to do violence to ourselves and others.”[1]

Clearly, we don’t must enlist in some intergalactic warfare to get caught up within the violence executed to our world. Taking a look at others with a watch of judgment, utilizing language that evokes hurt, and pondering ailing of ourselves—these are all types of violence that we’ve change into desensitized to. From the seeds of this numbness develop religious weeds.

In one other of his books, Residing Peace: A Spirituality of Contemplation and Motion, Pricey writes, “The tradition of violence would have us consider that simply as we’re violent, God should even be violent. . . . As a substitute of God the peacemaker, we’ve been taught to consider in god the warmaker. . . . Due to this, many reject God. Who would need something to do with such a terrifying prospect of ‘divine violence’?”[2]

Who certainly!

There aren’t any simple solutions to violence and struggling. Good folks serve in armed forces around the globe and shield the protection of communities massive and small. On the identical time, there are whole communities who don’t really feel protected, who don’t really feel that they will flip to authorities for defense, and consequently take up arms, adopting violent means for mere survival. There are these struggling beneath oppressive regimes who see no approach out however by means of the trail of violence, loss of life, and destruction. That is merely the world we reside in, and I don’t presume to have solutions to those snowballing tragedies.

And but, wouldn’t it not be good to at the least think about a world the place structural violence—weapons and tanks and nuclear warheads baked into the upkeep or development of societal order—was not vital? And the way far we’re from such imaginative potential after we scale back our spirituality and no matter phrase we use for God to not more than a blesser of wars!

“If we don’t deal with the violence on the planet, our interior peace is an empty phantasm,” Pricey continues. “Likewise, we can’t search peace publicly and count on to assist disarm the world whereas our hearts are full of violence, judgment, and rage.”[3]

In maybe one of many best monologues of your complete Star Wars franchise, the spymaster of Andor, Luthen Rael, lays out plainly the price of Riot: Luthen sacrifices his very soul to prop up the fledgling insurgent trigger. He employs the instruments of his enemy. “I burn my life to make a dawn that I do know I’ll by no means see,” he laments.

He, too, is a sufferer of a violent system. He, too, is unable to extract himself or envision a approach ahead that doesn’t necessitate violence.

And maybe he’s proper. Maybe there isn’t any technique to overthrow the Empire with out the shedding of blood. Clearly, Luthen has come to that conclusion, however he isn’t comfortable about it. He is aware of he has forfeited some basic a part of what it means to be human, to be alive.

What does that type of self-sacrifice do to an individual? How does somebody of this dedication emerge on the opposite facet, in a peaceable society that has transcended the Empire?

I have no idea the reply. However I do know it’s removed from simple. This arms race of violent extremism has no logical finish however within the full and utter annihilation of the enemy. Consider how damaged the Empire was after they have been lastly defeated at Jakku, an entire 12 months after the destruction of the second Demise Star—and even then, they fought on, losing lives and assets! Relatively than search peace, they fought till there was nothing and nobody left. That’s how twisted our rationale turns into on this system of violence.

Both we win all of it and we win it our approach, or we burn ourselves and the whole lot in attain to the bottom. It’s price reflecting on Emperor Palpatine’s contingency plan within the case of his loss of life—most notably seen within the online game Battlefront II. The 1st step was bOperation: Cinder, a galaxy-wide marketing campaign of genocidal destruction on Imperial and non-Imperial worlds alike. The aim? Sow chaos and loss of life and guarantee nobody claimed his mantle of energy. Sith, we’re advised, deal in absolutes. It’s the darkish facet that may discover no compromise, no lodging, no frequent floor upon which to construct from shared humanity and expertise.

In a sarcastic, biting retort from the nice sequence of books Star Wars: The New Jedi Order, Han Solo imagines how the Empire would have responded to the invasion of the mysterious, highly effective, and lethal alien species referred to as the Yuuzhan Vong.

What the Empire would have executed was construct a supercolossal Yuuzhan Vong–killing battle machine. They’d have referred to as it the Nova Colossus or the Galaxy Destructor or the Nostril of Palpatine or one thing equally grandiose. They’d have spent billions of credit, employed hundreds of contractors and subcontractors, and geared up it with the newest in death-dealing expertise. And you already know what would have occurred? It wouldn’t have labored. They’d neglect to bolt down a steel plate over an entry hatch resulting in the primary reactors, or another mistake, and a hotshot enemy pilot would drop a bomb down there and blow the entire thing up.[4]

An increasing number of violence. A refusal to hunt out a 3rd approach. The very epitome of a lifestyle that displays wealth, privilege, and energy. The continuing march to extra safety, security, and prosperity that necessitates a unending accumulation of energy and weaponry to outgun a would-be opponent. That’s the resolution of empire. That’s the resolution of the Empire. And that’s the resolution we too readily flip to, despite the fact that we all know it can’t presumably hold us protected or finish the violence and uncertainty and hazard. We pay increasingly more cash for this phantasm of security—and naturally, somebody is all the time prepared to money these checks. Bear in mind Star Wars: Episode VIII—The Final Jedi? We noticed the rich, privileged crowd on Canto Bight, how unaware and unconcerned they have been in regards to the precise lives of actual galactic residents. We noticed Finn’s reluctant discovery that each the First Order and the Resistance sought these people out to fund the warfare effort.

Nonetheless, we give in to our concern despite the fact that we all know the place concern leads, which is to the identical place as dealing in absolutes.

In all of the promotional supplies for The Final Jedi, we have been advised issues weren’t going to go the way in which we anticipated. Because it turned out, this proved to be true.

In what is probably one of the crucial stunning scenes, Luke Skywalker initiatives himself by means of the Power from Ahch-To all the way in which to Crait. There he confronts his nephew, Kylo Ren, in what I anticipated can be an epic showdown. Weren’t we all anticipating a lightsaber duel and the prospect to see the nice Jedi Grasp as soon as extra wield his legendary laser sword?

However blades by no means crossed. And, as we realized, the specter of violence between the 2 was by no means really actual. Kylo couldn’t have hit Luke even when he had been in a position to land a blow, and Luke seemingly was unable to destroy his nephew as a result of he was not likely there in any respect.

This was an instance of nonviolence masquerading as its reverse. A subverting of expectations. What gave the impression to be violence was its reverse. Nonviolence showing in surprising locations necessitates a special type of braveness and skillset however the identical type of sacrifice. Nonviolence permits others to flee with their lives, giving them the prospect to make new selections. John Pricey explains: “Nonviolence confronts systemic injustice with lively love however refuses to retaliate with additional violence beneath any circumstances. In an effort to halt the vicious cycle of violence, it requires a prepared acceptance of struggling and loss of life slightly than inflicting struggling or loss of life on anybody else. The artwork of nonviolence lies within the mastery of dying, not killing.”[5]

This sounds an terrible lot like what we noticed Luke do. In standing as much as injustice with love slightly than anger, and in bringing a willingness to simply accept his personal loss of life to provide each his nephew and the Resistance the chance to preserving going, Luke exhibited a mastery in private sacrifice and a devotion to the better good.

Love manifesting itself in self-sacrificing deeds: that’s the Christian story. That’s what God achieved by means of Jesus. The nonviolent Christ disrupts each the established order and societal expectations, going willingly to a violent loss of life in an effort to give us the prospect to reside a brand new lifestyle. That’s Easter—and day by day that follows.

That is the place hope leads us. We insist that there have to be one other approach, a 3rd approach, some nonviolent path that disrupts the established order. There have to be a path that resolutely stands as much as injustice and evil and destruction whereas not giving in and changing into what we search to destroy.

“It was mentioned that you’d destroy the Sith, not be part of them!” Obi-Wan screams at his fallen Padawan within the remaining moments of Revenge of the Sith. We hear the echo of his phrases as we make selections for peace and justice, mild and life, or energy, privilege, violence, and darkness.

Allow us to not change into what we search to destroy. Allow us to as a substitute think about a greater world, one constructed on hope.

EDITORIAL NOTE: This essay is tailored from the Afterword of My Life with the Jedi: The Spirituality of Star Wars (Loyola Press).


[1] John Pricey “The Nonviolent Life,” p. 27.

[2] John Pricey, “Residing Peace: A Spirituality of Contemplation and Motion,” p. 45.

[4] New Jedi Order: Future’s Approach, by Walter Jon Williams.

[5] John Pricey, “Residing Peace: A Spirituality of Contemplation and Motion,” p. 82.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles