Revelation 13:18 says that the one who “has understanding” ought to calculate the “variety of the beast.” This quantity is then additional recognized because the “variety of man,” particularly, 666. Preterists usually say that 666 refers to Nero in Revelation 13:18, however is that what John means when he says that the mark of the beast is 666?
Symbolism and the Mark of the Beast
Not everybody sees 666 as a reference to Nero. Many notable students have learn the mark of the beast symbolically. Beale, for instance, argues in his commentary that the mark of the beast is 666 as a result of six is the variety of imperfection. Thus, when six is used thrice because the mark of the beast, it emphasizes the completeness of imperfection.
Though this view is feasible, it’s unlikely. John’s command to “calculate” (ψηφισάτω) the variety of the beast is a time period that was used for numerical calculation. The time period derives from ψῆφος, which implies pebble. Utilizing pebbles to depend was a standard historical technique of tabulation. Thus, John states that the variety of the beast is said to his title (Rev 13:17). This calculation would presumably result in the identification of a selected particular person.
Gematria and the Mark of the Beast
Many students have appeared to gematria to assist perceive the mark of the beast. Gematria is a course of by which letters in a reputation are given numerical values or vice versa. It basically turns into a cipher. This was truly a widely known follow, though it’s debated how prevalent that is in Scripture. Some NT students assume the genealogies in Matthew 1 could possibly be an instance of gematria, the place three lists of 14 generations every correspond to the numerical worth of David’s title.
The Sibylline Oracles, an early A.D. pseudepigraphical work, offers an instance of gematria used with the title of Jesus.
To mortals within the earth; and he doth hear
4 vowels, and two consonants in him
Are twice introduced; the entire sum I’ll title:
For eight ones, and as many tens on these,
And but eight hundred will reveal the title
To males insatiate; and do thou discern
In thine personal understanding that the Christ
Is youngster of the immortal God most excessive.
Sibylline Oracles, 1:395–400.
The numerical significance talked about within the Oracles pertains to the title of Jesus. Jesus (Ιησους) provides as much as 888 as follows.
| Ι | η | σ | ο | υ | ς |
| 10 | 8 | 200 | 70 | 400 | 200 |
| Complete: 888 |
Different students have reported graffiti from Pompeii (destroyed AD 79), which reads, “I really like her whose quantity is 545.” Apparently, somebody was infatuated with a lady, the numerical significance of whose title added as much as 545!
Though we have to proceed cautiously, I believe gematria might present an applicable understanding of the mark of the beast as 666. It was culturally nicely attested at the moment, and it appears to make sense of John’s command to depend the variety of the beast (which is said to the variety of its title).
The Mark of the Beast and Nero
Many students establish 666 with Nero both immediately or by allusion. The everyday understanding is to take Nero’s title and title in Greek (Nero Caesar), and transliterate it into Hebrew (קסר נרון), after which take the numerical worth. It might appear like this:
| ן | ו | ר | נ | ר | ס | ק |
| 50 | 6 | 200 | 50 | 200 | 60 | 100 |
| Complete: 666 |
This seems to be good at first, however as I’ve written earlier than, Bible codes are very unwieldy. Though the above technically qualifies, there are not less than 5 arguments to make us rethink Nero’s identification with the mark of the beast.
1. For Nero to suit with 666, his title should be used.
For the mark of the beast to be equated with Nero, the total title “Nero Caesar” should be utilized in precisely that order. There are various names and titles that could possibly be chosen to establish Nero, however that is the mix that should be utilized.
This flexibility in utilizing titles with Nero appears a little bit too handy. Actually, if there aren’t any guidelines about what names and titles are allowed for use, each Domitian and Vespasian additionally will be numbered as 666. Furthermore, there may be even archaeological proof for Domitian’s abbreviated title discovered on cash. It reads as follows: Α ΚΑΙ ΔΟΜΕΤ ΣΕΒ ΓΕ.
| Α | Κ | Α | Ι | Δ | Ο | Μ | Ε | Τ | Σ | Ε | Β | Γ | Ε |
| 1 | 20 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 70 | 40 | 5 | 300 | 200 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Complete: 666 |
When such huge parameters are used with including handy titles, it turns into much less persuasive.
2. Revelation 13:17-18 specifies solely the title, not the title.
This level coincides with the earlier level. Revelation 13:17 specifies the hyperlink between the title and quantity. If titles are allowed, that goes past the purview of the textual content, and it additionally permits an excessive amount of flexibility. So, we must always count on Nero for use by itself. By means of illustration, after we consider the title of the President of the USA, we don’t say, “His title is President Abraham Lincoln.” We might say, “His title is Abraham Lincoln.”
It must also be famous at this level that Irenaeus (ca. 180 AD) was the primary one who tried to make use of gematria to search out the referent for 666, and the names he hypothesized didn’t embody titles (Adv. Haer. 5.30.3; Evanthas, Lateinos, and Teitan). Nor did he point out Nero as being a attainable achievement.
3. For Nero to suit with 666, a Hebrew transliteration is required.
The numerical worth of Caesar Nero in Greek is 1005. That is recognized explicitly by Suetonius (ca. 121 AD), who wrote that the worth of Nero’s title is similar because the phrase, “He killed his personal mom” (Suetonius, Nero, 39.2). Revelation was written to a Greek-speaking viewers, and it’s broadly acknowledged that the data of Hebrew was not as prevalent throughout this time (Aramaic was way more frequent for the Jewish viewers). So, using the values of gematria for Hebrew whereas writing Greek to a Greek-speaking viewers makes little sense.
4. For Nero to suit with 666, a faulty shortened spelling is required.
This is without doubt one of the most essential factors to make. For the gematria worth of Caesar Nero to equal 666, the Hebrew transliteration should be used (קסר נרון). Nonetheless, it is a faulty spelling for קסר, which is generally spelled קסיר (with a י within the center). This may equal 676 as a substitute of 666. There is just one Judean scroll fragment discovered at Murabba‘at, which may have a faulty spelling (though it’s debated whether or not that’s truly what it says). Though I’ve not personally seen the fragment, in his dissertation, Hitchcock notes that the fragment is lacking the letters following the ק. Though the broken scroll doesn’t have area for the total spelling ק(סיר), additionally it is not indeniable that the lacking letters are סר. Due to this fact, there isn’t any clear testimony of Hebrew spelling Caesar as קסר. On the similar time, as Hitchcock notes, within the Talmuds, Mishnah, Tosephta, and Tannaitic Midraishim, the spelling is full (קסיר). To place it plainly then, the 666 studying for Nero depends on a conjecture which has little to no proof.
It must also be famous that the O-class vowel in Nero (ו in נרון) has the potential to be faulty and drop out. The truth that preterists assume Nero is spelled in its full letter kind appears to be an instance of selective bias.
5. The early church didn’t perceive 666 to be a reference to Nero.
Now we have already talked about how Irenaeus, who was a disciple of Polycarp (who was a disciple of John) didn’t perceive 666 to be a reference to Nero. Moreover, there’s a textual variant in Revelation 13:18 the place some manuscripts learn 616. Irenaeus knew of this variant and known as it an inferior studying, and mentioned it was most likely attributable to a copyist error (Adv. Haer. 5.30.1). It might be a reasonably easy copyist error, complicated ι for ξ (which in handwritten manuscripts could be a straightforward mistake to make. Notably, not less than one different Greek manuscript reads 665. These variants present that there was not a unified understanding of the referent of this quantity, and subsequently Nero was not acknowledged because the supposed referent.
Some preterists attempt to take the 616 variant studying as additional proof for Nero, for the reason that Latin type of Nero’s title translated into Hebrew equals 616. Nonetheless, we’ve got the identical issues as outlined within the earlier factors. That is demonstrated by the truth that different students have recognized the 616 variant with Caligula. And it may also be related to Titus. In addition to the logical and methodological issues, this textual variant can simply be defined as a copyist error.
In commenting on this concern, Beale quotes Salmon:
“First, if the correct title by itself won’t yield it, add a title; secondly, if the sum can’t be present in Greek, attempt Hebrew, and even Latin; thirdly, don’t be too specific concerning the spelling.… We can not infer a lot from the truth that a key suits the lock if it’s a lock during which virtually any key will flip.”
Salmon, Historic Introduction, 230–31, quoted in Beale, 721.
The Mark of the Beast and Future Achievement
Though many students have tried to see Nero as a achievement of Revelation 13:18, there are too many issues with the methodology that may permit Nero to be the achievement. Nonetheless, I do assume that gematria is presumably the important thing to understanding Revelation 13:18. Moderately than a reference to Nero, I believe it stays to be fulfilled sooner or later. I believe that eschatological passages from Daniel and a pair of Thessalonians 2, particularly, display that the beast of Revelation will probably be a future determine. Nonetheless, whether it is speaking a couple of future particular person, then it’s doubtless not attainable to establish a selected referent right now.
Watch on Youtube
I’ve additionally recorded a podcast discussing this concern in additional element. You possibly can subscribe in your favourite podcasting app, or watch the Youtube model of the podcast beneath.
